Personally, my pursuit of equipment progressively evolved from just owning equipment, to owning the most expensive equipment, and to owning equipment specific to current requirements. At work, I am often asked, “What process is more important, shooting or post-editing?” As a commercial photographer, I am an advocate of post-editing. Photography is an art riddled with regret. However, there is little room for regret in commercial photography, and post-editing is vital to make up for these regrets. Thus, I articulate that shooting and post-editing are equally important. Many of my friends seek my recommendation when purchasing gear. They mostly inquire about camera bodies or lenses, or occasionally the tripod and other accessories, which are all associated with the initial shooting. Interestingly, few people ask me about post-editing gear. I assume that most people associated post-editing with the ownership of a computer, including me when I received my first fashion catalog assignment 10 years ago. I was flabbergasted when I found that the same clothing item has three entirely different colors in the viewfinder, on the display, and on the advance copy. It was not until then that I realized post-editing was also equipment intensive.